[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16083268#comment-16083268
 ] 

Dmitry Demeshchuk commented on BEAM-2572:
-----------------------------------------

Nevermind my last comment, credentials would have to be provider specific, 
which would indeed turn the interface into a {{ReadFromText('s3://somewhere', 
aws_credentials=..., gcp_credentials=..., azure_credentials=..., 
ftp_credentials=...)}} monstrosity.

> Implement an S3 filesystem for Python SDK
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-2572
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2572
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: sdk-py
>            Reporter: Dmitry Demeshchuk
>            Assignee: Ahmet Altay
>            Priority: Minor
>
> There are two paths worth exploring, to my understanding:
> 1. Sticking to the HDFS-based approach (like it's done in Java).
> 2. Using boto/boto3 for accessing S3 through its common API endpoints.
> I personally prefer the second approach, for a few reasons:
> 1. In real life, HDFS and S3 have different consistency guarantees, therefore 
> their behaviors may contradict each other in some edge cases (say, we write 
> something to S3, but it's not immediately accessible for reading from another 
> end).
> 2. There are other AWS-based sources and sinks we may want to create in the 
> future: DynamoDB, Kinesis, SQS, etc.
> 3. boto3 already provides somewhat good logic for basic things like 
> reattempting.
> Whatever path we choose, there's another problem related to this: we 
> currently cannot pass any global settings (say, pipeline options, or just an 
> arbitrary kwarg) to a filesystem. Because of that, we'd have to setup the 
> runner nodes to have AWS keys set up in the environment, which is not trivial 
> to achieve and doesn't look too clean either (I'd rather see one single place 
> for configuring the runner options).
> Also, it's worth mentioning that I already have a janky S3 filesystem 
> implementation that only supports DirectRunner at the moment (because of the 
> previous paragraph). I'm perfectly fine finishing it myself, with some 
> guidance from the maintainers.
> Where should I move on from here, and whose input should I be looking for?
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to