[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188971#comment-16188971
]
Solomon Duskis commented on BEAM-3008:
--------------------------------------
Cloud Bigtable is a constrained problem. Writes needs a Cloud project id,
instance id and table name. Reads also need a scan.
HBaseIO currently takes in a Configuration object. If there's a small set of
HBase configuration key/value pairs then it's absolutely makes sense to have
HBase specific configuration options.
HBaseIO and CloudBigtable need different configuration options. I think that
we can create an AbstractHBaseIO that defers Connection creation to a child
which would have the more specific configuration options.
> BigtableIO should use ValueProviders
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-3008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3008
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: sdk-java-gcp
> Reporter: Solomon Duskis
> Assignee: Solomon Duskis
>
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2057] is an effort towards BigtableIO
> templatization. This Issue is a request to get a fully featured template for
> BigtableIO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
