[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mairbek Khadikov updated BEAM-3973:
-----------------------------------
    Description: In 2.4.0, SpannerIO#read has been migrated to use batch API. 
The batch API provides abstractions to scale out reads from Spanner, but it 
requires the query to be root-partitionable. The root-partitionable queries 
cover majority of the use cases, however there are examples when running 
arbitrary query is useful. For example, reading all the table names from the 
information_schema.* and reading the content of those tables in the next step.  
 (was: In 2.4.0, SpannerIO#read has been migrated to use batch API. The batch 
API provides abstractions to scale out reads from Spanner, but it requires the 
query to be root-partitionable. The root-partitionable queries cover majority 
of the use cases, however there are examples when running arbitrary query is 
useful. For example, reading all the tables from the information_schema.* and 
reading the content of the schema schema in the next step. )

> Allow to disable batch API in SpannerIO
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-3973
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3973
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-gcp
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Mairbek Khadikov
>            Assignee: Mairbek Khadikov
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In 2.4.0, SpannerIO#read has been migrated to use batch API. The batch API 
> provides abstractions to scale out reads from Spanner, but it requires the 
> query to be root-partitionable. The root-partitionable queries cover majority 
> of the use cases, however there are examples when running arbitrary query is 
> useful. For example, reading all the table names from the 
> information_schema.* and reading the content of those tables in the next 
> step. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to