[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4049?focusedWorklogId=91305&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-91305
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-4049:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 16/Apr/18 12:05
            Start Date: 16/Apr/18 12:05
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: adejanovski commented on issue #5112: [BEAM-4049] 
Improve CassandraIO write throughput by performing async queries
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5112#issuecomment-381576412
 
 
   @echauchot : I plan to handle retries in a separate PR.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 91305)
    Time Spent: 2h 50m  (was: 2h 40m)

> Improve write throughput of CassandraIO
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-4049
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4049
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io-java-cassandra
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Alexander Dejanovski
>            Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: performance
>          Time Spent: 2h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The CassandraIO currently uses the mapper to perform writes in a synchronous 
> fashion. 
> This implies that writes are serialized and is a very suboptimal way of 
> writing to Cassandra.
> The IO should use the saveAsync() method instead of save() and should wait 
> for completion each time 100 queries are in flight, in order to avoid 
> overwhelming clusters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to