[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4862?focusedWorklogId=127765&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-127765
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-4862:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 26/Jul/18 14:18
            Start Date: 26/Jul/18 14:18
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: EricBeach opened a new pull request #6077: BEAM-4862 
Fixes bug in Spanner's MutationGroupEncoder by converting timestamps into Long 
and not Int.
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6077
 
 
   The crux of the bug is that 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z, which is a valid Timestamp 
per https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/data-types#timestamp-type, is too 
large for an integer. 
   
   So the following stack trace is generated:
   
   ```
   Caused by: java.io.IOException: varint overflow -62135596800
        at org.apache.beam.sdk.util.VarInt.decodeInt(VarInt.java:65)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodePrimitive(MutationGroupEncoder.java:453)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodeModification(MutationGroupEncoder.java:326)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodeMutation(MutationGroupEncoder.java:280)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decode(MutationGroupEncoder.java:264)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.SpannerIO$BatchFn.processElement(SpannerIO.java:1030)
        at 
org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.SpannerIO$BatchFn$DoFnInvoker.invokeProcessElement(Unknown
 Source)
        at 
org.apache.beam.runners.core.SimpleDoFnRunner.invokeProcessElement(SimpleDoFnRunner.java:185)
        at 
org.apache.beam.runners.core.SimpleDoFnRunner.processElement(SimpleDoFnRunner.java:146)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.SimpleParDoFn.processElement(SimpleParDoFn.java:323)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ParDoOperation.process(ParDoOperation.java:43)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.OutputReceiver.process(OutputReceiver.java:48)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn$1.output(GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.java:181)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner$1.outputWindowedValue(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:102)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.processElement(BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.java:124)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.processElement(BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.java:53)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.invokeProcessElement(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:115)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.processElement(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:73)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.processElement(GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.java:113)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ParDoOperation.process(ParDoOperation.java:43)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.OutputReceiver.process(OutputReceiver.java:48)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.runReadLoop(ReadOperation.java:200)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.start(ReadOperation.java:158)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.MapTaskExecutor.execute(MapTaskExecutor.java:75)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.executeWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:391)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.doWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:360)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.getAndPerformWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:288)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.doWork(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:134)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:114)
        at 
com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:101)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
   ```
   
   The solution is to parse the number of seconds that represent the date as 
Long and not Int, thereby avoiding the overflow error.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 127765)
            Time Spent: 10m
    Remaining Estimate: 23h 50m  (was: 24h)

> varint overflow -62135596800 exception with Cloud Spanner Timestamp 
> 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-4862
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4862
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-gcp
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Eric Beach
>            Assignee: Chamikara Jayalath
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 23h 50m
>
> tl;dr - If you try to write a Timestamp of value "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z" as a 
> Spanner Mutation, you get an overflow error.
>  
> The crux of the issue appears to be that 0001-01-01T00:00:00Z, which is a 
> valid Timestamp per 
> [https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/data-types#timestamp-type], is too 
> large for an integer. See the two lines of code below. 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.5.0/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/spanner/MutationGroupEncoder.java#L453]
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/279a05604b83a54e8e5a79e13d8761f94841f326/sdks/java/core/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/util/VarInt.java#L58]
>  
>  
> Stack Trade
> {{Caused by: java.io.IOException: varint overflow -62135596800 at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.util.VarInt.decodeInt(VarInt.java:65) at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodePrimitive(MutationGroupEncoder.java:453)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodeModification(MutationGroupEncoder.java:326)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decodeMutation(MutationGroupEncoder.java:280)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.MutationGroupEncoder.decode(MutationGroupEncoder.java:264)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.SpannerIO$BatchFn.processElement(SpannerIO.java:1030)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.sdk.io.gcp.spanner.SpannerIO$BatchFn$DoFnInvoker.invokeProcessElement(Unknown
>  Source) at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.core.SimpleDoFnRunner.invokeProcessElement(SimpleDoFnRunner.java:185)
>  at 
> org.apache.beam.runners.core.SimpleDoFnRunner.processElement(SimpleDoFnRunner.java:146)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.SimpleParDoFn.processElement(SimpleParDoFn.java:323)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ParDoOperation.process(ParDoOperation.java:43)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.OutputReceiver.process(OutputReceiver.java:48)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn$1.output(GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.java:181)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner$1.outputWindowedValue(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:102)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.processElement(BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.java:124)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.processElement(BatchGroupAlsoByWindowViaIteratorsFn.java:53)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.invokeProcessElement(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:115)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.processElement(GroupAlsoByWindowFnRunner.java:73)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.processElement(GroupAlsoByWindowsParDoFn.java:113)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ParDoOperation.process(ParDoOperation.java:43)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.OutputReceiver.process(OutputReceiver.java:48)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.runReadLoop(ReadOperation.java:200)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.start(ReadOperation.java:158)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.MapTaskExecutor.execute(MapTaskExecutor.java:75)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.executeWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:391)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.doWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:360)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.getAndPerformWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:288)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.doWork(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:134)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:114)
>  at 
> com.google.cloud.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:101)
>  at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>  at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)}}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to