[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5092?focusedWorklogId=137522&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-137522
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-5092:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 23/Aug/18 18:22
            Start Date: 23/Aug/18 18:22
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: reuvenlax opened a new pull request #6268: [BEAM-5092] 
Prevent hash-lookup of schema on every record
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6268
 
 
   In many cases, we know that an instance of FieldValueGetterFactory is always 
called with the same type. In this scenario, we can cache the value of the 
first call.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 137522)
    Time Spent: 7h 50m  (was: 7h 40m)

> Nexmark 10x performance regression
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-5092
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5092
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Andrew Pilloud
>            Assignee: Reuven Lax
>            Priority: Critical
>          Time Spent: 7h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There looks to be a 10x performance hit on the DirectRunner and Flink nexmark 
> jobs. It first showed up in this build:
> [https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Beam/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_Nexmark_Direct/151/changes]
> [https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5084698770407424]
> [https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5699257587728384]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to