[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3194?focusedWorklogId=142369&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-142369
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-3194:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/Sep/18 23:34
            Start Date: 07/Sep/18 23:34
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: robinyqiu commented on issue #6220: [BEAM-3194] Add 
integration test for support of @RequiresStableInput
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6220#issuecomment-419592606
 
 
   Hi Luke, I have made changes based on your feedback. I am working on the 
unit test for `FilePatternMatchingShardedFile` class now. Please take a look at 
the rest of the changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 142369)
    Time Spent: 2h 20m  (was: 2h 10m)

> Support annotating that a DoFn requires stable / deterministic input for 
> replay/retry
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-3194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3194
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: beam-model
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Yueyang Qiu
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 2h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> See the thread: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5fd81ce371aeaf642665348f8e6940e308e04275dd7072f380f9f945@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> We need this in order to have truly cross-runner end-to-end exactly once via 
> replay + idempotence.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to