jfarr commented on a change in pull request #11090: [BEAM-9470]
:sdks:java:io:kinesis:test is flaky
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11090#discussion_r391291506
##########
File path:
sdks/java/io/kinesis/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/kinesis/ShardReadersPoolTest.java
##########
@@ -324,10 +325,15 @@ public void shouldCallRateLimitPolicy()
}
}
+ ArgumentCaptor<List<KinesisRecord>> recordsCaptor =
ArgumentCaptor.forClass(List.class);
+ verify(customRateLimitPolicy,
atLeastOnce()).onSuccess(recordsCaptor.capture());
+ List<List<KinesisRecord>> capturedRecords = recordsCaptor.getAllValues();
+ assertThat(capturedRecords).contains(
+ ImmutableList.of(a, b),
+ singletonList(c),
+ singletonList(d),
+ Collections.emptyList()
+ );
verify(customRateLimitPolicy).onThrottle(same(e));
- verify(customRateLimitPolicy).onSuccess(eq(ImmutableList.of(a, b)));
- verify(customRateLimitPolicy).onSuccess(eq(singletonList(c)));
- verify(customRateLimitPolicy).onSuccess(eq(singletonList(d)));
Review comment:
Yes, thanks Alexey. I was just working on something similar. Maybe the test
is just overspecified then. I propose we change the validations to just:
```
verify(customRateLimitPolicy).onThrottle(any(KinesisClientThrottledException.class));
verify(customRateLimitPolicy, atLeastOnce()).onSuccess(any(List.class));
```
If you both agree I'll make that change.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
