alexvanboxel commented on a change in pull request #10529: [BEAM-9044] Protobuf 
options to Schema options
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10529#discussion_r396977813
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
sdks/java/extensions/protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/protobuf/ProtoSchemaTranslator.java
 ##########
 @@ -205,10 +205,12 @@ static Schema getSchema(Descriptors.Descriptor 
descriptor) {
         // Store proto field number in metadata.
         FieldType fieldType =
             withMetaData(beamFieldTypeFromProtoField(fieldDescriptor), 
fieldDescriptor);
 
 Review comment:
   Is it, I don't think so... because I told Reuven I would do metadata after 
this. Still I think it's a good idea... and with your comment I want to revise 
the URI:
   
   - `beam:option:proto:field:vptech.data.v1.description` for a proto field 
option
   - `beam:option:proto:message:vptech.data.v1.description` for a proto message 
option
   - `beam:option:proto:meta:number` for a proto field number
   - `beam:option:proto:meta:type_name` for a proto type name
   
   WDYT?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to