I'm concerned that we will rename it, then the new semantics we choose will result in a second rename. I agree with Davor that we should pin down the interface and semantics so we only do the rename once. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:28 Robert Bradshaw (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15212123#comment-15212123 > ] > > Robert Bradshaw commented on BEAM-147: > -------------------------------------- > > There is consensus that the name "Aggregators" is confusing, and it makes > sense to rename it as part of the larger set of backwards incompatible > changes rather than later. Thought the exact semantics of this features is > still being pounded out, it seems well enough defined to give it a name at > this point. > > > Rename Aggregator to [P]Metric > > ------------------------------ > > > > Key: BEAM-147 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-147 > > Project: Beam > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: beam-model, sdk-java-core, sdk-py > > Reporter: Robert Bradshaw > > Assignee: Frances Perry > > > > The name "Aggregator" is confusing. > > See discussion at > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-user/201603.mbox/browser > and > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201603.mbox/browser > . Exact name still being bikeshedded. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) >
