[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15264823#comment-15264823
]
Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-241:
--------------------------------------
This is getting into the realm of providing a backend/worker programming model
as well. Dropping of too-late messages is essentially an operation interposed
at the appropriate place in a runner. Which is not to vote against this - it
falls right in with `ReduceFnRunner` and the proposed side-input-awaiting
utilities as part of the runners/core package, which we are in the processing
of spinning off.
> Not easy for runners to get late-data dropping
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-241
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-241
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runner-core
> Reporter: Mark Shields
> Assignee: Frances Perry
>
> Quite by accident realized the Flink runner delegates to
> GroupAlsoByWindowViaWindowSetDoFn for GBK, which in turn delegates to
> ReduceFnRunner. The latter now assumes no messages will arrive beyond the
> 'garbage collection' time of their target window(s).
> The Dataflow runner interposes a LateDataDroppingDoFnRunner into the path so
> as to drop those too-late messages. That's done (I think) using
> DoFnRunners.createDefault.
> I don't think the Flink runner does that.
> We need a nice runner-friendly way of dealing with the too-late data.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)