[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15675022#comment-15675022
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BEAM-999:
-------------------------------------
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1377
> DirectRunner flake related to splitting
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-999
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runner-direct
> Affects Versions: Not applicable
> Reporter: Daniel Halperin
> Assignee: Thomas Groh
> Fix For: Not applicable
>
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_MavenVerify/1838/
> {code}
> Error Message
> Expected: a value greater than <1>
> but: <1> was equal to <1>
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> Expected: a value greater than <1>
> but: <1> was equal to <1>
> at org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat(MatcherAssert.java:20)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:865)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertThat(Assert.java:832)
> at
> org.apache.beam.runners.direct.BoundedReadEvaluatorFactoryTest.boundedSourceEvaluatorProducesDynamicSplits(BoundedReadEvaluatorFactoryTest.java:183)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:127)
> at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:26)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:55)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:161)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:121)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
