#667: Error rendering forbidden pages
------------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: olemis
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Release 8
Component: ui design | Version: 0.7.0
Resolution: | Keywords: permissions, chrome
------------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by olemis):
Replying to [comment:12 rjollos]:
> I applied [attachment:t667_r1526822_error_mainnav.tests.diff​], executed
the functional tests and saw the following error:
> {{{
> ======================================================================
> FAIL: runTest (tests.functional.admin.RegressionTestBhTicket667)
> No error after removing all permissions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
"/home/user/Workspace/bhdev/bloodhound.git/bloodhound_multiproduct/tests/functional/admin.py",
line 42, in runTest
> prefix = tester.create_product()
> File
"/home/user/Workspace/bhdev/bloodhound.git/bloodhound_multiproduct/tests/functional/__init__.py",
line 740, in create_product
> tc.formvalue('new', 'action', 'new')
> File
"/home/user/Workspace/bhdev/bloodhound.git/trac/trac/tests/functional/better_twill.py",
line 153, in better_formvalue
> raise twill.errors.TwillAssertionError(*args)
> TwillAssertionError: ('no matching forms!',
'/home/user/Workspace/bhdev/bloodhound.git/trac/testenv/trac/log/RegressionTestBhTicket667.html')
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> }}}
>
That's what attachment:t598_r1526159_form_id.diff:ticket:598 is for .
> I'm not sure what led to the error,
Have you applied that patch ? See comment:8
> but the bigger problem I see is that revoking all permissions for
anonymous and not restoring them after the test is finished would affect
other functional tests.
That's normal with functional test cases . They are not as isolated as
unit tests .
>
> It reminds me though, I have been considering a change to the Trac
functional test environment whereby all permissions would be revoked from
`anonymous` and `authenticated`.
In principle I see this as useful ...
> I think that change would make it easier to write tests by allowing a
user to be created and their permissions to be explicitly set - they
wouldn't inherit any permissions.
... mainly because of this ...
> It would probably require many changes to existing Trac functional
tests, however.
... but this is also true .
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/667#comment:13>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound issue tracker
