StevenLuMT commented on PR #3471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3471#issuecomment-1252556144

   > @StevenLuMT of course it's defined in the bom, but it's not the reason we 
put it in our dependency! I didn't see any usage of log4j1 in bookkeeper.
   
   good catch, log4j-1.2-api is no use in project, 
   I misunderstood,thanks very much @Shoothzj 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to