RaulGracia commented on issue #3466: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/3466#issuecomment-1265261133
Thanks a lot @dlg99, I can certainly review #3513. But after the latest experiments we did with Bookkeeper 4.14.3, which includes #2794, we couldn't reproduce the issue, so I'm not sure that that PR is contributing to the issue described here. In any case, it is independent from the value that #3513 brings by itself. > Can the lost ledger handle might be caused by the way Pravega handles errors in ledger open? The point is that the very same Pravega code has no issues using Bookkeeper 4.14.2 client and injecting network failures, and we consistently get issues like the one describe here when upgrading to Bookkeeper 4.15 client. For this reason, I thought that the problem may be related to some change in the Bookkeeper client within `branch-4.15`. I think that to discar that the issue is present in the whole `branch-4.14`, we will reproduce fault injection tests with latest 4.14 release; if the issue is cannot be reproduced, we know that `branch-4.14` is fine in this regard (and we do not need to inspect cherry picked PRs). If the issue is reproduced, the number of commits to analyze would be much smaller. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
