rename with _ so that pages build

Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/commit/e16046c3
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/tree/e16046c3
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/diff/e16046c3

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: e16046c30789732a2e5b14041719d8ee3c661fc9
Parents: f88394f
Author: Alex Heneveld <[email protected]>
Authored: Thu Nov 2 11:23:19 2017 +0000
Committer: Alex Heneveld <[email protected]>
Committed: Thu Nov 2 11:23:19 2017 +0000

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 guide/ops/upgrades/_systems-under-mgmt.md | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 guide/ops/upgrades/systems-under-mgmt.md  | 24 ------------------------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/blob/e16046c3/guide/ops/upgrades/_systems-under-mgmt.md
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/guide/ops/upgrades/_systems-under-mgmt.md 
b/guide/ops/upgrades/_systems-under-mgmt.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5a63af5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/guide/ops/upgrades/_systems-under-mgmt.md
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+
+## Upgrading Systems Under Management
+
+Blueprints can encode update processes for the systems they describe.
+The mechanisms for updating systems vary, depending whether it is stateless or 
stateful,
+whether following an immutable pattern (replacing components) 
+or doing it on box (traditional, possibly taking systems out of action while 
upgrading), 
+and whether applying an upgrade to many resources on a rolling fashion 
(repaving, blue-green).
+For this reason there is not a one-size-fits-all upgrade pattern to use in 
blueprints,
+but there are some common patterns that may be applicable:
+
+* Defining an `upgrade` effector on nodes, and on a cluster to apply to all 
nodes
+* Using a config key such as `version` which can be updated and reapplied
+* Exposing a `deploy` effector to pass files that should be run, such as WAR 
files,
+  and invoking this effector with newer versions of WAR files to install
+
+There are many more, and if you've written some good pieces to share,
+please consider contributing them so others can take advantage of them!
+
+
+
+ 
+ 
+

http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/brooklyn-docs/blob/e16046c3/guide/ops/upgrades/systems-under-mgmt.md
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/guide/ops/upgrades/systems-under-mgmt.md 
b/guide/ops/upgrades/systems-under-mgmt.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 5a63af5..0000000
--- a/guide/ops/upgrades/systems-under-mgmt.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-
-## Upgrading Systems Under Management
-
-Blueprints can encode update processes for the systems they describe.
-The mechanisms for updating systems vary, depending whether it is stateless or 
stateful,
-whether following an immutable pattern (replacing components) 
-or doing it on box (traditional, possibly taking systems out of action while 
upgrading), 
-and whether applying an upgrade to many resources on a rolling fashion 
(repaving, blue-green).
-For this reason there is not a one-size-fits-all upgrade pattern to use in 
blueprints,
-but there are some common patterns that may be applicable:
-
-* Defining an `upgrade` effector on nodes, and on a cluster to apply to all 
nodes
-* Using a config key such as `version` which can be updated and reapplied
-* Exposing a `deploy` effector to pass files that should be run, such as WAR 
files,
-  and invoking this effector with newer versions of WAR files to install
-
-There are many more, and if you've written some good pieces to share,
-please consider contributing them so others can take advantage of them!
-
-
-
- 
- 
-

Reply via email to