[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045977#comment-15045977
]
Thibault Kruse commented on BUILDR-710:
---------------------------------------
I see. I think at least buildr could provide more text to explain the
situation. I assumed that to consume a Gemfile, I would use gem or bundler, but
not buildr. After all, my project is a java project, not a ruby project, and
buildr is advertized as "Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based
applications, including support for Scala, Groovy and a growing number of JVM
languages and tools."
There might as well be a pom.xml, build.xml, build.gradle or a package.json
lying around, and I would not want buildr to pick any of those either. So if
buildr could at least explain that it picks up the Gemfile, that might be nice.
> Buildr gets confused over Gemfile
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: BUILDR-710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-710
> Project: Buildr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core features
> Affects Versions: 1.4.21
> Reporter: Thibault Kruse
> Priority: Minor
>
> Hi,
> Using buildr-1.4.23
> I had a Gemfile in my current Dir hwen invoking buildr, leading to buildr
> failing with errors like:
> Could not find addressable-2.3.8 in any of the sources
> Run `bundle install` to install missing gems.
> The Gemfile was:
> {code}
> source "https://rubygems.org";
> gem "jekyll"
> gem "html-proofer"
> gem "asciidoctor-pdf"
> gem "coderay"
> gem "pygments.rb"
> {code}
> I don't know if that is standard ruby behavior maybe, but I feel buildr
> should not care whether a gemfile is present or not. - See more at:
> http://www.forumjar.com/forums/topic/Apache_Buildr_gets_confused_over_Gemfile#sthash.Rivie2GQ.dpuf
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
