harrysarson commented on PR #2012: URL: https://github.com/apache/buildstream/pull/2012#issuecomment-2911513827
> Not shipping the file which conflicts with perf seems to be a perfectly sound approach. This, or distributing your trace program under a different name if it is a different tool. With the split-rule + compose approach (that requires the changes in this PR) we give the element that integrates the elements the choice on whether to remove the offending file, if `perf` isn't going into the disk image then it would make sense to be able to keep the other version of `trace`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
