wnob commented on PR #2973: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2973#issuecomment-1320707981
@tjbanghart > Wouldn't `DATETIME` map to Calcite's interpretation of a `TIMESTAMP` due to the lack of TZ info? Neither has tz info. I included a little table in the design doc that shows similarities between types in BQ and Calcite, and BQ `TIMESTAMP` maps pretty well to Calcite's `TIMESTAMP`. There isn't really a good existing type for `DATETIME` in Calcite. I think we'll have to implement one. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
