tanclary commented on code in PR #3677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3677#discussion_r1498162592


##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/adapter/enumerable/RexToLixTranslator.java:
##########
@@ -647,58 +541,225 @@ private static Expression checkExpressionPadTruncate(
     }
   }
 
+  private Expression translateCastToDate(RelDataType sourceType,
+      Expression operand, ConstantExpression format,
+      Supplier<Expression> defaultExpression) {
+
+    switch (sourceType.getSqlTypeName()) {
+    case CHAR:
+    case VARCHAR:
+      // If format string is supplied, parse formatted string into date
+      return Expressions.isConstantNull(format)
+          ? Expressions.call(BuiltInMethod.STRING_TO_DATE.method, operand)
+          : 
Expressions.call(Expressions.new_(BuiltInMethod.PARSE_DATE.method.getDeclaringClass()),

Review Comment:
   Yeah that makes sense. I think explicitly passing the class is more 
readable, it tells the user exactly where the method is defined. I also think 
it conforms better with the rest of Calcite. Up to you though



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to