silundong commented on code in PR #4267: URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4267#discussion_r2018038815
########## core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/ExpandDisjuctionRule.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.calcite.rel.rules; + +import org.apache.calcite.plan.RelOptRuleCall; +import org.apache.calcite.plan.RelOptUtil; +import org.apache.calcite.plan.RelRule; +import org.apache.calcite.rel.RelNode; +import org.apache.calcite.rel.core.Filter; +import org.apache.calcite.rel.core.Join; +import org.apache.calcite.rel.metadata.RelMetadataQuery; +import org.apache.calcite.rel.type.RelDataTypeField; +import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexCall; +import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexInputRef; +import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexNode; +import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexTableInputRef; +import org.apache.calcite.rex.RexUtil; +import org.apache.calcite.tools.RelBuilder; +import org.apache.calcite.util.ImmutableBitSet; + +import com.google.common.collect.Lists; + +import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable; +import org.immutables.value.Value; + +import java.util.HashMap; +import java.util.Iterator; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Map; +import java.util.Set; + +/** + * Rule to expand disjuction in condition of a {@link Filter} or {@link Join}, + * It makes sense to make this optimization part of the predicate pushdown. For example: + * + * <blockquote><pre>{@code + * select t1.name from t1, t2 + * where t1.id = t2.id + * and ( + * (t1.id > 20 and t2.height < 50) + * or + * (t1.weight < 200 and t2.sales > 100) + * ) + * }</pre></blockquote> + * + * <p>we can expand to obtain the condition + * + * <blockquote><pre>{@code + * t1.id > 20 or t1.weight < 200 + * t2.height < 50 or t2.sales > 100 + * }</pre></blockquote> + * + * <p>new generated predicates are redundant, but they could be pushed down to + * scan operator of t1/t2 and reduce the cardinality. + * + * <p>This rule should only be applied once to avoid generate same redundant expression and + * it should be used before {@link CoreRules#FILTER_INTO_JOIN} and {@link CoreRules#JOIN_CONDITION_PUSH}. + * + * @see CoreRules#EXPAND_FILTER_DISJUCTION + * @see CoreRules#EXPAND_JOIN_DISJUCTION + */ [email protected] +public class ExpandDisjuctionRule + extends RelRule<ExpandDisjuctionRule.Config> + implements TransformationRule { + + /** + * Creates a ExpandDisjuctionRule. + */ + protected ExpandDisjuctionRule(Config config) { + super(config); + } + + @Override public void onMatch(RelOptRuleCall call) { + config.matchHandler().accept(this, call); + } + + /** + * Expand predicates for condition of a {@link Filter} or {@link Join}. + */ + private static RexNode apply( + RexNode condition, + RelNode relNode, + List<RelDataTypeField> fieldList, + RelBuilder relBuilder, + RelMetadataQuery mq) { + HashMap<Integer, RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef> inputRefToTableRef = new HashMap<>(); + ImmutableBitSet columnBits = RelOptUtil.InputFinder.bits(condition); + if (columnBits.isEmpty()) { + return condition; + } + // Trace which table does the column referenced in the condition come from + for (int columnBit : columnBits.asList()) { + Set<RexNode> exprLineage = + mq.getExpressionLineage( + relNode, + RexInputRef.of(columnBit, fieldList)); + // If mq.getExpressionLineage cannot get result, skip it + if (exprLineage == null) { + continue; + } + Set<RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef> relTableRefs = + RexUtil.gatherTableReferences(Lists.newArrayList(exprLineage)); + // If the column come from multiple tables, skip it + if (relTableRefs.isEmpty() || relTableRefs.size() > 1) { + continue; + } + inputRefToTableRef.put(columnBit, relTableRefs.iterator().next()); + } + + ExpandDisjuctionHelper expandHelper = + new ExpandDisjuctionHelper(inputRefToTableRef, relBuilder); + Map<RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef, RexNode> expandResult = expandHelper.expandDeep(condition); + RexNode newCondition = condition; + for (RexNode expandCondition : expandResult.values()) { + newCondition = relBuilder.and(newCondition, expandCondition); + } + return newCondition; + } + + private static void matchFilter(ExpandDisjuctionRule rule, RelOptRuleCall call) { + Filter filter = call.rel(0); + RelMetadataQuery mq = call.getMetadataQuery(); + RelBuilder relBuilder = call.builder(); + + RexNode newCondition = + apply( + filter.getCondition(), + filter, + filter.getRowType().getFieldList(), + relBuilder, + mq); + if (newCondition.equals(filter.getCondition())) { + return; + } + Filter newFilter = filter.copy(filter.getTraitSet(), filter.getInput(), newCondition); + call.transformTo(newFilter); + } + + private static void matchJoin(ExpandDisjuctionRule rule, RelOptRuleCall call) { + Join join = call.rel(0); + RelMetadataQuery mq = call.getMetadataQuery(); + RelBuilder relBuilder = call.builder(); + + List<RelDataTypeField> fieldList = + Lists.newArrayList(join.getLeft().getRowType().getFieldList()); + fieldList.addAll(join.getRight().getRowType().getFieldList()); + RexNode newCondition = + apply( + join.getCondition(), + join, + fieldList, + relBuilder, + mq); + if (newCondition.equals(join.getCondition())) { + return; + } + Join newJoin = + join.copy( + join.getTraitSet(), + newCondition, + join.getLeft(), + join.getRight(), + join.getJoinType(), + join.isSemiJoinDone()); + call.transformTo(newJoin); + } + + /** + * Helper class to expand predicates. + */ + private static class ExpandDisjuctionHelper { + + private final Map<Integer, RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef> inputRefToTableRef; + + private final RelBuilder relBuilder; + + private ExpandDisjuctionHelper( + Map<Integer, RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef> inputRefToTableRef, + RelBuilder relBuilder) { + this.inputRefToTableRef = inputRefToTableRef; + this.relBuilder = relBuilder; + } + + /** + * Expand predicates recursively that can be pushed down to single table. + * + * @param condition Predicate to be expanded + * @return Additional predicates that can be pushed down for each table + */ + private Map<RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef, RexNode> expandDeep(RexNode condition) { + Map<RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef, RexNode> additionalConditions = new HashMap<>(); + ImmutableBitSet inputRefs = RelOptUtil.InputFinder.bits(condition); + if (inputRefs.isEmpty()) { + return additionalConditions; + } + RexTableInputRef.RelTableRef tableRef = inputRefsBelongOneTable(inputRefs); + // The condition already belongs to one table, return it directly + if (tableRef != null) { + additionalConditions.put(tableRef, condition); + return additionalConditions; + } + + // Recursively expand the expression according to whether it is a conjunction + // or a disjunction. If it is neither a disjunction nor a conjunction, it cannot + // be expanded further and an empty Map is returned. + switch (condition.getKind()) { + case AND: + List<RexNode> andOperands = RexUtil.flattenAnd(((RexCall) condition).getOperands()); Review Comment: The complexity here depends on the size of the expression tree with AND and OR as non-leaf nodes and other expressions as leaf nodes. I don't think the expression tree would be particularly deep for usual SQL. The code currently has an early return logic, that is, the columns used in the current expression are all from the same table. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
