xiedeyantu commented on code in PR #4361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/4361#discussion_r2076462674
##########
core/src/test/resources/sql/planner.iq:
##########
@@ -132,12 +132,13 @@ EnumerableCalc(expr#0..2=[{inputs}], $f0=[$t1], $f1=[$t2])
# [CALCITE-7000] Extend IntersectToSemiJoinRule to support n-way inputs
!set planner-rules "-EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_INTERSECT_RULE,
+ -CoreRules.INTERSECT_TO_DISTINCT,
+CoreRules.INTERSECT_TO_SEMI_JOIN"
select a from (values (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)) as t1 (a)
intersect
select a from (values (1), (2)) as t2 (a)
intersect
-select a from (values (1), (4)) as t3 (a);
+select a from (values (1), (4), (null)) as t3 (a);
Review Comment:
Thank you for your detailed review. The reason for this result is that there
is no good way to control the order of rules, as you mentioned before. This is
the only way to do it now, and it may be the same for JdbcTest. I will think
about what good way to control the order later.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
