rubenada commented on code in PR #5184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/5184#discussion_r3803374385
##########
core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexProgramTest.java:
##########
@@ -3024,6 +3025,124 @@ trueLiteral, literal(1),
checkSimplifyUnchanged(div(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(false)), nullInt));
}
+ /**
+ * Test cases for <a
href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7722";>[CALCITE-7722]
+ * RexSimplify IS [NOT] NULL on a safe operator with Strong policy ANY and
unsafe operands
+ * can be further simplified</a>.
+ */
+ @Test void testSimplifyIsNotNullDistributesAcrossStrongOpWithLossyCast() {
+ // "(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER + 1) IS NOT NULL" ==> "IS NOT
NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)"
+ // The outer PLUS is strong AND shallow-safe; distribution keeps the
+ // non-lossless CAST inside the rewrapped IS NOT NULL
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNotNull(plus(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(1))),
+ "IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
+
+ // Symmetric IS NULL peel:
+ // "(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER + 1) IS NULL" ==> "IS
NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)"
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNull(plus(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(1))),
+ "IS NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
+
+ // Confirm this is consistent with same expression without CAST
+ checkSimplify(isNotNull(plus(vInt(), literal(1))), "IS NOT NULL(?0.int0)");
+ checkSimplify(isNull(plus(vInt(), literal(1))), "IS NULL(?0.int0)");
+
+ // MULTIPLY is also strong + shallow-safe
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNotNull(mul(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(2))),
+ "IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNull(mul(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(2))),
+ "IS NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
+ checkSimplify(isNotNull(mul(vInt(), literal(2))), "IS NOT NULL(?0.int0)");
+ checkSimplify(isNull(mul(vInt(), literal(2))), "IS NULL(?0.int0)");
+
+ // PLUS of two non-lossless CAST
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNotNull(
+ plus(
+ cast(vVarchar(0), tInt(true)),
+ cast(vVarchar(1), tInt(true)))),
+ "AND(IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER), IS NOT
NULL(CAST(?0.varchar1):INTEGER))");
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNull(
+ plus(
+ cast(vVarchar(0), tInt(true)),
+ cast(vVarchar(1), tInt(true)))),
+ "OR(IS NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER), IS
NULL(CAST(?0.varchar1):INTEGER))");
+
+ // Nested PLUS:
+ // "((CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER + 1) + 2) IS NOT NULL"
+ // ==> "IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)"
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNotNull(
+ plus(plus(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(1)), literal(2))),
+ "IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
+
+ // Operators with checked arithmetic
+ checkSimplify(
+ isNotNull(checkedPlus(cast(vVarchar(), tInt(true)), literal(1))),
+ "IS NOT NULL(CAST(?0.varchar0):INTEGER)");
Review Comment:
I'll create a ticket.
I'd prefer to keep them, with a clarifying comment stating that this
simplification is "controversial" and should be reviewed. So that when the
follow-up ticket gets addressed, these tests would (should) fail and they would
need to be adapted. Otherwise, if we remove them, we can risk that they never
get reinstated back again.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
