Author: jstrachan
Date: Tue Jun 15 13:44:01 2010
New Revision: 954881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=954881&view=rev
Log:
added a helper method to make it easy to build up camel routes generically with
reflection from inside Scala code. The current ProcessorDefinition type
declaration, being recursive, seems to cause some issues when trying to use the
typesafe APIs in Scala on a ProcessorDefintion to add a new step. One day we
maybe should introduce a super type below ProcessorDefintion which is a simple
non-recursive generic type so it can be easily used from both java and scala
without hitting our heads on generics pain & only using these complex recursive
generic types for the return values of typesafe DSL methods.
Modified:
camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/ProcessorDefinition.java
Modified:
camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/ProcessorDefinition.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/ProcessorDefinition.java?rev=954881&r1=954880&r2=954881&view=diff
==============================================================================
---
camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/ProcessorDefinition.java
(original)
+++
camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/ProcessorDefinition.java
Tue Jun 15 13:44:01 2010
@@ -141,6 +141,20 @@ public abstract class ProcessorDefinitio
return children;
}
+ /**
+ * A helper method to add an output node to this processor definition
which can avoid the use of hairy generics
+ * when using Scala code
+ */
+ public boolean addOutputObject(Object node) {
+ if (node instanceof ProcessorDefinition) {
+ addOutput((ProcessorDefinition) node);
+ return true;
+ }
+ else {
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
public void addOutput(ProcessorDefinition processorType) {
processorType.setParent(this);
configureChild(processorType);
