Author: buildbot
Date: Fri Mar 15 02:17:04 2013
New Revision: 854560
Log:
Production update by buildbot for camel
Modified:
websites/production/camel/content/cache/main.pageCache
websites/production/camel/content/camel-30-ideas.html
Modified: websites/production/camel/content/cache/main.pageCache
==============================================================================
Binary files - no diff available.
Modified: websites/production/camel/content/camel-30-ideas.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/production/camel/content/camel-30-ideas.html (original)
+++ websites/production/camel/content/camel-30-ideas.html Fri Mar 15 02:17:04
2013
@@ -90,10 +90,12 @@
<h3><a shape="rect" name="Camel3.0-Ideas-JDKsupport"></a>JDK support</h3>
-<p>(+1: claus, cmueller)</p>
+<p>(+1: claus, cmueller)<br clear="none">
+(-1: hadrian)</p>
<p>We should drop support for JDK6, and require JDK7 as minimim version. eg
build and compile the release with JDK7.<br clear="none">
-We should aim to be compatible with JDK8.</p>
+We should aim to be compatible with JDK8.<br clear="none">
+(hz) Why? Isn't OpenJDK 6 still supported by RedHat and very much in use? Even
Oracle's Java 6 is still in use. Maybe some bundles would require JDK7+, buy
why not keep things like the api for instance still supported with Java 6? A
strong argument may sway my opinion, but for now, I fail to see the reason.</p>
<h3><a shape="rect" name="Camel3.0-Ideas-JDK8JavaDSL"></a>JDK8 Java DSL</h3>
