christophd commented on issue #3725: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3725#issuecomment-1271543801
> I've noticed that if we run an Integration without the camel.apache.org/operator.id annotation, then, the behavior is to use the namespace operator where this is stored I do not think that this is the current behavior. From what I know all resources that are missing the `camel.apache.org/operator.id` annotation should only be handled by the default global operator (id=camel-k). The namespace where the default operator and the integration resource are located in is not relevant in this scenario. So in my eyes using the default annotation `camel.apache.org/operator.id: camel-k` and skipping the annotation completely should have the same effect. Both resources should be handled by the default operator (id=camel-k) regardless of the namespace. Does that make sense? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
