squakez commented on issue #3831: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3831#issuecomment-1326109864
> This seems a good idea, and would decouple the camel-k-operator from the integration build, which is good for the operator scalability and availability. Related to this shared volume, that is going to grow indefinitely, it would be interesting to have some sort of monitoring, also thinking when upgrading camel-k-operator, and the integrations are rebuilt, the old artifacts won't be used anymore, should they be deleted ? I guess some sort of monitoring should be provided anyhow. We'll dig into details for sure. For now, I am interested in collecting feedback about possible downside I am not able to see in this draft analysis. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
