squakez commented on issue #4185: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/4185#issuecomment-1488123984
Yeah, I don't think this is semantically wrong. We're also forgetting that in the middle there is an Integration CR that is probably `Ready` as well. The whole chain of dependencies in this case is the following: `KameletBinding` --> `Integration` --> `Deployment` --> `Pod`. We internally use the status to know how to reconciliate a resource. From an operator standpoint, if a failure is happening in the `Pod` because a network failure, there is nothing we can do on the `KameletBinding` CR. As @lburgazzoli suggests, we could probably use a different naming for the phase, but, it would be the same logic we use now for `Ready` I guess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
