orpiske commented on issue #5452: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/5452#issuecomment-1781509757
> @orpiske The fix seems to cover both regression issues (-5% with Camel 4.0.1 and -25% with Camel 4.1.0). > > In such cases, would the fix be back-ported to Camel 4.0.x ? 4.1.x ? Not sure how it relates to LTS. The problem with both versions are of the same nature: the code not caching an expensive value. This particular fix covers only the case with Camel 4.2 (and, potentially, 4.1). However, Camel 4.1 is not an LTS version, so it won't be back-ported. As for 4.0.x ... Because it uses the old type converter, I am not sure if I will back-port this code. The type converter is full of edge cases and pretty hard to maintain. BTW, would it be possible to provide a new flamegraph with the fix applied please? I noticed a few other (unrelated) items that I would like to look at more closely. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
