allthingssecurity opened a new pull request, #27309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27309

   # Description
   
   [CAMEL-25280](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-25280)
   
   Follow-up of #27242 (CAMEL-25245), as suggested in its review.
   
   `SnmpProducer` kept one request PDU in a field, created in `doStart`. The 
producer of an endpoint is shared by all its concurrent exchanges, and the 
`GET_NEXT` walk changes that PDU for every request (`clear()`, then the next 
OID). SNMP4J also encodes the same PDU object again when it retries after a 
timeout. So walks running at the same time on one endpoint changed each other's 
requests: a walk whose request was retried while another walk ran got the 
answer for the other walk's last OID, ended its subtree early and returned an 
incomplete list, without an error.
   
   This change creates the request PDU for each exchange (the code that built 
it in `doStart` moves to a method that `process` calls).
   
   Tests:
   - `ConcurrentWalkTest` (new): an SNMP4J test agent with two subtrees that 
does not answer the very first request. A first walk starts; once its first 
request was dropped, a second walk runs on the same endpoint while the first 
waits for its retry.
   - Without the change the first walk returns `[b1, b2]` instead of `[a1, a2, 
b1, b2]`.
   - With the change all camel-snmp tests pass: 16 tests, 0 failures.
   
   Conflicts with #27242: both change the lines of the walk loop. The same 
change applied on top of #27242 passes there too (22 tests); whichever is 
merged second needs a small rebase (the walk uses the local `pdu` instead of 
`this.pdu`).
   
   # Target
   
   - [x] I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 
uses the `main` branch)
   
   # Tracking
   - [x] If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked 
there is a [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL) filed for 
the change (usually before you start working on it).
   
   # Apache Camel coding standards and style
   
   - [x] I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful 
subject line and body.
   - [ ] I have run `mvn clean install -DskipTests` locally from root folder 
and I have committed all auto-generated changes.
     (I built and tested the affected module, including the formatter and 
import-sort plugins. I did not run the full root build.)
   
   # AI-assisted contributions
   
   - [x] If this PR includes AI-generated code, commits have proper 
co-authorship attribution (e.g., `Co-authored-by` trailers) and the PR 
description identifies the AI tool used.
     This PR was prepared with Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5). The commit 
carries a `Co-Authored-By` trailer.
   
   _Claude Code on behalf of allthingssecurity_
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to