apupier opened a new pull request, #27882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/27882

   JmsRequestReplyExclusiveReplyToTest and
   JmsRequestReplyExclusiveReplyToComponentTest
   assert that 5 request/reply calls over an exclusive replyTo queue complete in
   less than 4200 ms. This check dates from CAMEL-4202, which introduced 
replyToType=Exclusive: an exclusive reply queue needs no JMS message selector
   and caches its consumer, so it is expected to be much faster than a shared 
one
   (JmsRequestReplySharedReplyToTest asserts the opposite, > 2 s). Run alone the
   5 calls take about 90 ms, so the threshold is a loose ceiling that must be 
kept.
   
   The failures reported in CAMEL-25664 (11928 ms, 8629 ms, and a 20 s latch 
timeout
   in JmsRequestReplyExclusiveReplyToConcurrentTest) come from CPU/broker 
contention:
   camel-jms enables JUnit parallel class execution
   (camel.surefire.parallel=true),
   and these classes ran in the shared pool next to many other tests using the
   in-VM Artemis broker (the concurrent test was in the not-parallel group, 
which
   still runs with forkCount=4).
   
   Tag the three classes with "exclusive" so that they run in the dedicated 
exclusive-test surefire execution (forkCount=2, reuseForks=false), which the
   default-test and serials-test executions exclude. The timing assertions are
   unchanged.
   
   Co-authored-by: IBM Bob 2.2.1
   
   # Description
   
   <!--
   - Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand 
what the pull request does, how, and why.
   -->
   
   # Target
   
   - [ ] I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 
uses the `main` branch)
   
   # Tracking
   - [ ] If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked 
there is a [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL) filed for 
the change (usually before you start working on it).
   
   <!--
   # *Note*: trivial changes like, typos, minor documentation fixes and other 
small items do not require a JIRA issue. In this case your pull request should 
address just this issue, without pulling in other changes.
   -->
   
   # Apache Camel coding standards and style
   
   - [ ] I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful 
subject line and body.
   
   <!--
   If you're unsure, you can format the pull request title like `[CAMEL-XXX] 
Fixes bug in camel-file component`, where you replace `CAMEL-XXX` with the 
appropriate JIRA issue.
   -->
   
   - [ ] I have run `mvn clean install -DskipTests` locally from root folder 
and I have committed all auto-generated changes.
   
   <!--
   You can run the aforementioned command in your module so that the build 
auto-formats your code. This will also be verified as part of the checks and 
your PR may be rejected if if there are uncommited changes after running `mvn 
clean install -DskipTests`.
   
   You can learn more about the contribution guidelines at 
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
   -->
   
   # AI-assisted contributions
   
   - [ ] If this PR includes AI-generated code, commits have proper 
co-authorship attribution (e.g., `Co-authored-by` trailers) and the PR 
description identifies the AI tool used.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to