This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

oscerd pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/camel-website.git

commit c354d83d8233b0b37fbf5f2ad0fb0b0732403e28
Author: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Sep 4 09:09:42 2026 +0200

    Added CVE-2026-85296
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
    Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013qz9ir11vuQYfQApzwHAHD
    Signed-off-by: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
---
 content/security/CVE-2026-85296.md      | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 content/security/CVE-2026-85296.txt.asc | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.md 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6d47daa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-85296"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-85296.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-85296
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-AS2: cross-partner signing key confusion - per-request signing 
material was held in state shared across requests, so a receipt could be signed 
with the key belonging to a different trading partner"
+description: "Signing material belonging to an individual request was stored 
in state that is shared across requests rather than confined to the request 
being processed. Where a deployment serves more than one trading partner, 
concurrent or successive requests could therefore observe each other's 
material, and a Message Disposition Notification could be signed with the key 
of a partner other than the one the receipt was for. The result is 
cross-partner key confusion: a receipt attributab [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Per-request signing keys are now 
confined to the request being processed in ResponseMDN. For deployments that 
cannot upgrade immediately, run a separate Camel context per trading partner so 
that no signing material is shared between them."
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24429 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25641 
(commit 659176dec58522fbebea11a1f6d5ee5c37f235d9), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25869 (commit 
ab5eacd3fa485eb990cf021dc56e48465c060d39) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25870 (commit 
19f91785f9e975e7734efd514946c2dfdbdbd1d7).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-488 Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session. 
The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this fix and does not receive 
it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or later.
diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.txt.asc 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e522f58f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-85296.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+Hash: SHA512
+
+- ---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-85296"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-85296.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-85296
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-AS2: cross-partner signing key confusion - per-request signing 
material was held in state shared across requests, so a receipt could be signed 
with the key belonging to a different trading partner"
+description: "Signing material belonging to an individual request was stored 
in state that is shared across requests rather than confined to the request 
being processed. Where a deployment serves more than one trading partner, 
concurrent or successive requests could therefore observe each other's 
material, and a Message Disposition Notification could be signed with the key 
of a partner other than the one the receipt was for. The result is 
cross-partner key confusion: a receipt attributab [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Per-request signing keys are now 
confined to the request being processed in ResponseMDN. For deployments that 
cannot upgrade immediately, run a separate Camel context per trading partner so 
that no signing material is shared between them."
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+- ---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24429 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25641 
(commit 659176dec58522fbebea11a1f6d5ee5c37f235d9), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25869 (commit 
ab5eacd3fa485eb990cf021dc56e48465c060d39) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25870 (commit 
19f91785f9e975e7734efd514946c2dfdbdbd1d7).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-488 Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session. 
The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this fix and does not receive 
it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or later.
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEJ2Y0ButtuvUpHyYV406fOAL/QQAFAmqabrYACgkQ406fOAL/
+QQDXewf/aoyxF5Z1jooYzrjYGlfdHq3F6K/LsCQV1SuRffkdmLGtTaMOyKsZs+4t
+ziqnY3sZ4/yqKTzr6lzA3yOZuWHjeRwnZptXQVEnTMjhhUj2ORMTAQDFzHTyxDlr
+u7AZTgaT6IXOmFkNwhNqBGLPDnEBRapuSjlfQxHJHGnQxT1BGdGUA4swM2r7OWve
+Zaqp7Z1QFREn7SmHg3RnEpVzNfrLZunsjXguq7E3tqsEMEUITii0ltCBaamlGHG4
+PPh00Va7oN4eWsCUPaajEvBLYZMkLSxsgsegig1mL4OdQVjLdE62uIByklGd1HOH
+WtAQVbt4eu2VnXASAPgrOvvd+rWIjg==
+=bxLy
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to