This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

oscerd pushed a commit to branch new-wave-of-cves
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/camel-website.git

commit 41fa24ec5a06756ac3c4fce295638a03502938c7
Author: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Sep 4 09:09:41 2026 +0200

    Added CVE-2026-85245
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
    Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013qz9ir11vuQYfQApzwHAHD
    Signed-off-by: Andrea Cosentino <[email protected]>
---
 content/security/CVE-2026-85245.md      | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++
 content/security/CVE-2026-85245.txt.asc | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)

diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.md 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a320d090
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-85245"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-85245.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-85245
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-Thrift: cross-exchange data disclosure - unmarshalling 
deserialized into the shared defaultInstance rather than a copy, so fields set 
by one message remained visible to the next"
+description: "The Thrift data format unmarshalled incoming data into the 
shared defaultInstance of the target type rather than into a fresh copy, and 
returned that shared object as the exchange body. Because the instance is 
shared process-wide, state written while unmarshalling one message stayed on 
the object and was visible to every later message that used the same type. 
Fields absent from a later payload retained the previous message's values, so 
content belonging to one sender could  [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Unmarshalling now deserializes 
into a copy, so each exchange gets its own instance and no state carries 
between messages. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, copy the 
unmarshalled body into a new instance immediately after the data format runs, 
and do not retain references to th [...]
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24442 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25823 
(commit c52d3cfa1c343a49261d77a5213dba92244a38f6), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25940 (commit 
260989268cbc6d258b1fcba63770be8ebbec40cb) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25942 (commit 
af1efbcccf5882b1ef0094db718972da3190e7e9).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-488 Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session. 
The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this fix and does not receive 
it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or later.
diff --git a/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.txt.asc 
b/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.txt.asc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5797802c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/security/CVE-2026-85245.txt.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
+Hash: SHA512
+
+- ---
+title: "Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-85245"
+date: 2026-08-31T10:00:00+02:00
+url: /security/CVE-2026-85245.html
+draft: false
+type: security-advisory
+cve: CVE-2026-85245
+severity: MEDIUM
+summary: "Camel-Thrift: cross-exchange data disclosure - unmarshalling 
deserialized into the shared defaultInstance rather than a copy, so fields set 
by one message remained visible to the next"
+description: "The Thrift data format unmarshalled incoming data into the 
shared defaultInstance of the target type rather than into a fresh copy, and 
returned that shared object as the exchange body. Because the instance is 
shared process-wide, state written while unmarshalling one message stayed on 
the object and was visible to every later message that used the same type. 
Fields absent from a later payload retained the previous message's values, so 
content belonging to one sender could  [...]
+mitigation: "Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on 
the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x 
LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Unmarshalling now deserializes 
into a copy, so each exchange gets its own instance and no state carries 
between messages. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, copy the 
unmarshalled body into a new instance immediately after the data format runs, 
and do not retain references to th [...]
+credit: "This issue was discovered by Claude Security Scan Tool"
+affected: "From 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1."
+fixed: 4.18.5, 4.22.1 and 4.23.0
+- ---
+
+The JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24442 refers to 
the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.
+
+The fix was merged on main in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25823 
(commit c52d3cfa1c343a49261d77a5213dba92244a38f6), backported to camel-4.22.x 
in https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25940 (commit 
260989268cbc6d258b1fcba63770be8ebbec40cb) and to camel-4.18.x in 
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25942 (commit 
af1efbcccf5882b1ef0094db718972da3190e7e9).
+
+The issue is classified as CWE-488 Exposure of Data Element to Wrong Session. 
The camel-4.14.x line reached end of life before this fix and does not receive 
it; deployments on 4.14.x should move to 4.18.5 or later.
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+
+iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEJ2Y0ButtuvUpHyYV406fOAL/QQAFAmqabrUACgkQ406fOAL/
+QQDnrQf9GSy1Qtmfph5Z4MfmdCJNOHqU1YBulGbioq0ohJDkab2MNpA0kH18MayA
+VsoeLG0/8/xhcI2ga+KduUsGb8CPgivpHJsJ+vFl9TjfJ0gPI2O6g6owsUR5FJnA
+V/u6997hVqx8J9jGB0dijQZfDPyV4+RwMvbDjpEJTq0gtazeMO3SBLysr7bSpoW3
+dHIz9yUIFhGYtqkBUVGrBlvAVEYfhVpIDB8QT3AlM9D+tW8r4q9OaAOsvslLpRd5
+rbdBrv840WS4n59o/49cNXOI1UNjBBvLjghIc8KBmADsfz+nVIlV8Ft2z8LlVDrQ
+0vM7ZDsUg49HT3kyz8AzJoNIvnUh7w==
+=/zyo
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to