[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893806#action_12893806
]
Folke Behrens commented on CASSANDRA-1237:
------------------------------------------
I don't think you can make authorization pluggable: authorization is very
specific, it requires predefined permissions and/or group/role names, and authz
is done at many places in the code. I recommend an authorization infrastructure
that does not authorize users directly but groups or roles. An authenticator
must return a list of groups a user belongs to and the authz infrastructure
renders a list of permissions. In Cassandra you just ask if
UserX.isAllowedTo(READ, "Keyspace1");
> Store AccessLevels externally to IAuthenticator
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1237
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Stu Hood
> Assignee: Stu Hood
> Fix For: 0.7 beta 1
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-Consolidate-KSMetaData-mutations-into-copy-methods.patch,
> 0002-Thrift-and-Avro-interface-changes.patch,
> 0003-Add-user-and-group-access-maps-to-Keyspace-metadata.patch,
> 0004-Remove-AccessLevel-return-value-from-login-and-retur.patch,
> 0005-Move-per-thread-state-into-a-ClientState-object-1-pe.patch,
> 0006-Apply-access.properties-to-keyspaces-during-an-upgra.patch,
> sample-usage.patch, simple-jaas-authenticator.patch
>
>
> Currently, the concept of authentication (proving the identity of a user) is
> mixed up with permissions (determining whether a user is able to
> create/read/write databases). Rather than determining the permissions that a
> user has, the IAuthenticator should only be capable of authenticating a user,
> and permissions (specifically, an AccessLevel) should be stored consistently
> by Cassandra.
> The primary goal of this ticket is to separate AccessLevels from
> IAuthenticators, and to persist a map of User->AccessLevel along with:
> * EDIT: Separating the addition of 'global scope' permissions into a separate
> ticket
> * each keyspace, where the AccessLevel continues to have its current meaning
> ----
> In separate tickets, we would like to improve the AccessLevel structure so
> that it can store role/permission bits independently, rather than being level
> based.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
