[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14163555#comment-14163555
]
Carl Yeksigian commented on CASSANDRA-7409:
-------------------------------------------
The other change between the two modes is that in LCS currently we check from
the highest level down to find a compaction, this goes from the lowest level up.
We would get some benefits from doing an L0 same-level compaction, so I think
that sounds like a good idea.
I fixed a bug that was preventing concurrent L0->L1 compactions, so the commit
changed recently. I'm going to start working with [~enigmacurry] to do
performance testing on this.
> Allow multiple overlapping sstables in L1
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7409
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7409
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Carl Yeksigian
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Labels: compaction
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently, when a normal L0 compaction takes place (not STCS), we take up to
> MAX_COMPACTING_L0 L0 sstables and all of the overlapping L1 sstables and
> compact them together. If we didn't have to deal with the overlapping L1
> tables, we could compact a higher number of L0 sstables together into a set
> of non-overlapping L1 sstables.
> This could be done by delaying the invariant that L1 has no overlapping
> sstables. Going from L1 to L2, we would be compacting fewer sstables together
> which overlap.
> When reading, we will not have the same one sstable per level (except L0)
> guarantee, but this can be bounded (once we have too many sets of sstables,
> either compact them back into the same level, or compact them up to the next
> level).
> This could be generalized to allow any level to be the maximum for this
> overlapping strategy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
