[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14206311#comment-14206311
 ] 

Benjamin Lerer commented on CASSANDRA-8241:
-------------------------------------------

It is a nice to have, but in my opinion it does make a big change. So I would 
stick with javassist for now and look at it in the future if some users are 
really pushing for it.

> Use javac instead of javassist
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8241
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Robert Stupp
>            Assignee: Robert Stupp
>              Labels: udf
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: 8241-ecj.txt, udf-java-javac.txt
>
>
> Using JDK's built-in Java-Compiler API has some advantages over javassist.
> Although compilation feels a bit slower, Java compiler API has some 
> advantages:
> * boxing + unboxing works
> * generics work
> * compiler error messages are better (or at least known) and have line/column 
> numbers
> The implementation does not use any temp files. Everything's in memory.
> Patch attached to this issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to