[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14230287#comment-14230287
]
Jonathan Shook commented on CASSANDRA-8371:
-------------------------------------------
If we are to hold to the idea of minimally useful granularity, then we haven't
reached that point with DTCS yet. The only backwards-compatible change that
provides something workable is in-fact inconsistent with the parameter
conventions. That's the rub. I am advocating that we fix it in some useful way
while it is still "early", in order to avoid having to deal with "0.00069" and
the like from now on. My suggestion for suffixes was just base on my own wishes
for something that was consistent, obvious, and easy to use.
My assertion is essentially that sub 1 day max times will be more common than
initially assumed.
Regarding repairs, I do not feel comfortable with the notion that the value has
to always be high enough for repair to see it before the max age. There is no
guarantee of that. If there is repair involvement, then it should be handled as
orthogonally as possible. What bad things are we concerned about happening if
repair has to supplement one of these files after the max age?
> DateTieredCompactionStrategy is always compacting
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8371
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: mck
> Assignee: Björn Hegerfors
> Labels: compaction, performance
> Attachments: java_gc_counts_rate-month.png,
> read-latency-recommenders-adview.png, read-latency.png,
> sstables-recommenders-adviews.png, sstables.png, vg2_iad-month.png
>
>
> Running 2.0.11 and having switched a table to
> [DTCS|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6602] we've seen that
> disk IO and gc count increase, along with the number of reads happening in
> the "compaction" hump of cfhistograms.
> Data, and generally performance, looks good, but compactions are always
> happening, and pending compactions are building up.
> The schema for this is
> {code}CREATE TABLE search (
> loginid text,
> searchid timeuuid,
> description text,
> searchkey text,
> searchurl text,
> PRIMARY KEY ((loginid), searchid)
> );{code}
> We're sitting on about 82G (per replica) across 6 nodes in 4 DCs.
> CQL executed against this keyspace, and traffic patterns, can be seen in
> slides 7+8 of https://prezi.com/b9-aj6p2esft/
> Attached are sstables-per-read and read-latency graphs from cfhistograms, and
> screenshots of our munin graphs as we have gone from STCS, to LCS (week ~44),
> to DTCS (week ~46).
> These screenshots are also found in the prezi on slides 9-11.
> [~pmcfadin], [~Bj0rn],
> Can this be a consequence of occasional deleted rows, as is described under
> (3) in the description of CASSANDRA-6602 ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
