[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14244552#comment-14244552
]
Joshua McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-8452:
--------------------------------------------
The failure / check on maybeReopenEarly isn't about whether it's posix or not
but about whether it's ntfs (and pre-nio technically, though we're
all-or-nothing windows on 2.1). Is there a reason we shouldn't reduce this to
isWindows and hasProcFS checks and move forward with the assumption of
posix-compliance if not Windows, given the platforms we run on?
Seems unnecessary to have the isPosix structure simply to add that to the check
on the fs for proc.
> Add missing systems to FBUtilities.isUnix, add FBUtilities.isWindows
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8452
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8452
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Blake Eggleston
> Assignee: Blake Eggleston
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.1.3
>
> Attachments: CASSANDRA-8452-v2.patch, CASSANDRA-8452-v3.patch,
> CASSANDRA-8452.patch
>
>
> The isUnix method leaves out a few unix systems, which, after the changes in
> CASSANDRA-8136, causes some unexpected behavior during shutdown. It would
> also be clearer if FBUtilities had an isWindows method for branching into
> Windows specific logic.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
