[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14305283#comment-14305283
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-6936:
-------------------------------------------

(JB's issue: CASSANDRA-8730)

It sounds tractable for 3.0 if we start soon; neither backwards compatibility 
with old-version sstables nor telling clients that v4 protocol includes new 
serialization formats should be a huge obstacle.

> Make all byte representations of types comparable by their unsigned byte 
> representation only
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6936
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> This could be a painful change, but is necessary for implementing a 
> trie-based index, and settling for less would be suboptimal; it also should 
> make comparisons cheaper all-round, and since comparison operations are 
> pretty much the majority of C*'s business, this should be easily felt (see 
> CASSANDRA-6553 and CASSANDRA-6934 for an example of some minor changes with 
> major performance impacts). No copying/special casing/slicing should mean 
> fewer opportunities to introduce performance regressions as well.
> Since I have slated for 3.0 a lot of non-backwards-compatible sstable 
> changes, hopefully this shouldn't be too much more of a burden.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to