[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14360422#comment-14360422
]
T Jake Luciani commented on CASSANDRA-7168:
-------------------------------------------
bq. Do we actually need to add a special ConsistencyLevel?
There is nothing requiring it but seems pragmatic before making it the default
(or at least a way to opt-out). This might make a good option once/if we get
to CASSANDRA-8119
There might be cases where we want the old behavior that I haven't though of
yet...
> Add repair aware consistency levels
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7168
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7168
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: T Jake Luciani
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> With CASSANDRA-5351 and CASSANDRA-2424 I think there is an opportunity to
> avoid a lot of extra disk I/O when running queries with higher consistency
> levels.
> Since repaired data is by definition consistent and we know which sstables
> are repaired, we can optimize the read path by having a REPAIRED_QUORUM which
> breaks reads into two phases:
>
> 1) Read from one replica the result from the repaired sstables.
> 2) Read from a quorum only the un-repaired data.
> For the node performing 1) we can pipeline the call so it's a single hop.
> In the long run (assuming data is repaired regularly) we will end up with
> much closer to CL.ONE performance while maintaining consistency.
> Some things to figure out:
> - If repairs fail on some nodes we can have a situation where we don't have
> a consistent repaired state across the replicas.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
