[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-1788:
--------------------------------------

    Attachment: 1788-v3.txt

v3 w/ Gary's trick of copying just the Header part to maintain compatibility.

> reduce copies on read, write paths
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1788
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1788
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: 1788-v2.txt, 1788-v3.txt, 1788.txt
>
>
> Currently, we do _three_ unnecessary copies (that is, writing to the socket 
> is necessary; any other copies made are overhead) for each message:
> - constructing the Message body byte[] (this is typically a call to a 
> ICompactSerializer[2] serialize method, but sometimes we cheat e.g. in 
> SchemaCheckVerbHandler's reply)
> - which is copied to a buffer containing the entire Message (i.e. including 
> Header) when sendOneWay calls Message.serializer.serialize()
> - which is copied to a newly-allocated ByteBuffer when sendOneWay calls packIt
> - which is what we write to the socket
> For deserialize we perform a similar orgy of copies:
> - IncomingTcpConnection reads the Message length, allocates a byte[], and 
> reads the serialized Message into it
> - ITcpC then calls Message.serializer().deserialize, which allocates a new 
> byte[] for the body and copies that part
> - finally, the verbHandler (determined by the now-deserialized Message 
> header) deserializes the actual object represented by the body
> Most of these are out of scope for 0.7 but I think we can at least elide the 
> last copy on the write path and the first on the read.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to