[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14485904#comment-14485904
 ] 

Tyler Hobbs commented on CASSANDRA-8528:
----------------------------------------

Somewhat, yes.  CASSANDRA-9037 was similar.

Unfortunately there's not much we can do without splitting out that part of the 
driver into a separate lib that we can update ourselves.

As a workaround until we're able to resolve that or upgrade the bundled driver, 
your function could take no arguments (and return null, if needed).

> Add an ExecutionException to the protocol
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8528
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Robert Stupp
>              Labels: client-impacting, protocolv4
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: 8528-001.txt, 8528-002.txt, 8528-003.txt
>
>
> With the introduction of UDF, we should add an ExecutionException (or 
> FunctionExecutionException or something like that) to the exceptions that can 
> be sent back to client. We can't guarantee that UDFs won't throw and none of 
> our existing exception is terribly adapted to report such event to the client.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to