[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Boudreault updated CASSANDRA-9345:
---------------------------------------
Description:
--> This issue doesn't affect any release and is only reproducible in a dev
branch
While working on CASSANDRA-7409, we noticed that there were some bad
performance with LCS. It seems that the compaction is not triggered as it
should. The performance is really bad when using low heap but we can also see
that using a big heap there are something wrong with the number of compactions.
Here are the graphs that compare 2.1 vs the dev branch (Take care when
visualizing the graphs, the y-axis scales differ due to some peaks):
http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-LH.html
http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-BH.html
I've attached the stress yaml config used for this test.
was:
** This issue doesn't affect any release and is only reproducable in a dev
branch **
While working on CASSANDRA-7409, we noticed that there were some bad
performance with LCS. It seems that the compaction is not triggered as it
should. The performance is really bad when using low heap but we can also see
that using a big heap there are something wrong with the number of compactions.
Here are the graphs that compare 2.1 vs the dev branch (Take care when
visualizing the graphs, the y-axis scales differ due to some peaks):
http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-LH.html
http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-BH.html
I've attached the stress yaml config used for this test.
> LeveledCompactionStrategy bad performance
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9345
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alan Boudreault
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Attachments: temperature.yaml
>
>
> --> This issue doesn't affect any release and is only reproducible in a dev
> branch
> While working on CASSANDRA-7409, we noticed that there were some bad
> performance with LCS. It seems that the compaction is not triggered as it
> should. The performance is really bad when using low heap but we can also see
> that using a big heap there are something wrong with the number of
> compactions.
> Here are the graphs that compare 2.1 vs the dev branch (Take care when
> visualizing the graphs, the y-axis scales differ due to some peaks):
> http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-LH.html
> http://dl.alanb.ca/perf/lcs-2.1-vs-trunk-BH.html
> I've attached the stress yaml config used for this test.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
