[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14539841#comment-14539841
 ] 

Tupshin Harper commented on CASSANDRA-7622:
-------------------------------------------

I think the assumption should be that each virtual table supports a subset of 
the queries performed on regular tables. If the virtual table can support all 
operations great, but otherwise noops or unsupported exceptions should be fine 
if a given operation doesn't make sense for the table.

The locality of the data (and whether distributed or not), should be internal 
to the implementation of each virtual table.

Using JMX, I suggest this as a simplified starting point:
CREATE TABLE jmx (
  node_id uuid,
  metric_type text,
  attributes map<text, text>,
  host_ip text static,
  PRIMARY KEY ((node_id), metric_type)
)
CREATE INDEX host_by_ip ON jmx (host_ip) #this will work after CASSANDRA-8103 

SELECT attributes FROM jmx where node_id = 
'eedea3e3-e36d-4371-8937-57f5a8303165' #returns all metrics for a given node
SELECT attributes FROM jmx where host_ip = '10.10.10.10'  and 
metric_type='CompactionManager' #returns all compaction metrics for a given 
node, looking up the node by a pseudo secondary index




> Implement virtual tables
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Tupshin Harper
>            Assignee: Benjamin Lerer
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> There are a variety of reasons to want virtual tables, which would be any 
> table that would be backed by an API, rather than data explicitly managed and 
> stored as sstables.
> One possible use case would be to expose JMX data through CQL as a 
> resurrection of CASSANDRA-3527.
> Another is a more general framework to implement the ability to expose yaml 
> configuration information. So it would be an alternate approach to 
> CASSANDRA-7370.
> A possible implementation would be in terms of CASSANDRA-7443, but I am not 
> presupposing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to