[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14549094#comment-14549094
]
Jon Haddad edited comment on CASSANDRA-6477 at 5/18/15 9:19 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Not a fan of materialized query tables personally. We frequently refer to the
various tables that people need to create to query their data as materialized
views, and people seem to understand immediately.
was (Author: rustyrazorblade):
Not a fan of materialized query tables personally.
To put it in context, we frequently refer to the various tables that people
need to create to query their data as materialized views, and people seem to
understand immediately.
> Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes)
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: API, Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Labels: cql
> Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Local indexes are suitable for low-cardinality data, where spreading the
> index across the cluster is a Good Thing. However, for high-cardinality
> data, local indexes require querying most nodes in the cluster even if only a
> handful of rows is returned.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
