[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14564801#comment-14564801
 ] 

Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-9486:
--------------------------------------------

Unless I misunderstand your description, we do update(...) the normal cells as 
well, in ColumnIndex.Builder.add(...);

But, I guess, if you have a very wide partition with "only" range tombstones, 
you can hit this, will add some remove logic when adding a RT as well

> LazilyCompactedRow accumulates all expired RangeTombstones
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9486
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 3.x, 2.1.x, 2.0.x, 2.2.x, 1.2.x
>
>         Attachments: 0001-9486.patch
>
>
> LazilyCompactedRow initializes a ColumnIndex.Builder to use its 
> RangeTombstone.Tracker, but it only calls update() with a RT argument, never 
> an atom. The Tracker only ever _adds_ if it receives a RT, never removes. So 
> all the RT ever seen for the partition (that have expired) remain in memory 
> until the compaction completes. To make matters worse, this then forces a 
> linear scan of all of these RT for each live cell we add, so this extra load 
> hangs around for a long time, and compactions stall.
> This issue is biting one of our users badly (at least, it seems likely to be 
> this issue), and there may be others. This user is not even making use of RT 
> extensively themselves, only collections (presumably with a complete 
> overwrite of the contents of the collection, resulting in a RT being 
> generated).
> Probably the best solution is to make the RT addition itself remove any 
> already present that are no longer helpful.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to