[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14565313#comment-14565313
]
Nick Bailey commented on CASSANDRA-9436:
----------------------------------------
i think broadcast is probably what we really want. thats what shows up in the
peers table for other nodes in the cluster. can't hurt to put both in i suppose
though.
> Expose rpc_address and listen_address of each Cassandra node
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9436
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9436
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Piotr Kołaczkowski
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
>
> When running Cassandra nodes with collocated Spark nodes and accessing such
> cluster from remote, to get data-locality right, we need to tell Spark the
> locations of the Cassandra nodes and they should match the addresses that
> Spark nodes bind to. Therefore in cloud environments we need to use private
> IPs for that. Unfortunately, the client which connects from remote would know
> only the broadcast rpc_addresses which are different.
> Can we have the IP/hostname that every C* node binds to exposed in a system
> table?
> system.peers table contains that information, but it doesn't contain that
> information for the local node.
> So can we have listen_address and rpc_address added to the system.local table?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
