[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14567181#comment-14567181
]
Etienne Adam commented on CASSANDRA-8340:
-----------------------------------------
I didn't know DTCS and read repair were incompatible.. But I can still run
nodetool repair, isn'it ?
>From my understanding of Cassandra, read repair or nodetool repair are
>mandatory to have a sane cluster over time.. Am I wrong ?
> Use sstable min timestamp when deciding if an sstable should be included in
> DTCS compactions
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8340
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8340
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 8340-v2.diff, 8340.diff
>
>
> Currently we check how old the newest data (max timestamp) in an sstable is
> when we check if it should be compacted.
> If we instead switch to using min timestamp for this we have a pretty clean
> migration path from STCS/LCS to DTCS.
> My thinking is that before migrating, the user does a major compaction, which
> creates a huge sstable containing all data, with min timestamp very far back
> in time, then switching to DTCS, we will have a big sstable that we never
> compact (ie, min timestamp of this big sstable is before
> max_sstable_age_days), and all newer data will be after that, and that new
> data will be properly compacted
> WDYT [~Bj0rn] ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
