[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14575318#comment-14575318
]
Andy Tolbert commented on CASSANDRA-9558:
-----------------------------------------
Thanks [~aboudreault]!
For reference, [JAVA-738|https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/JAVA-738]
was previously opened to evaluate the pool implementation for protocol version
3+. I've also opened up
[JAVA-802|https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/JAVA-802] to ensure we
incorporate testing java-driver RCs with cassandra-stress to ensure there is no
performance regression as part of the test/release process. I'll continue
doing a performance evaluation of the driver with cassandra-stress to see if
anything obvious sticks out on the driver side.
> Cassandra-stress regression in 2.2
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9558
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9558
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alan Boudreault
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: 2.1.log, 2.2.log, CASSANDRA-9558-ProtocolV2.patch,
> stress-2.1-java-driver-2.0.9.2.log, stress-2.1-java-driver-2.2+PATCH.log,
> stress-2.1-java-driver-2.2.log, stress-2.2-java-driver-2.2+PATCH.log,
> stress-2.2-java-driver-2.2.log
>
>
> We are seeing some regression in performance when using cassandra-stress 2.2.
> You can see the difference at this url:
> http://riptano.github.io/cassandra_performance/graph_v5/graph.html?stats=stress_regression.json&metric=op_rate&operation=1_write&smoothing=1&show_aggregates=true&xmin=0&xmax=108.57&ymin=0&ymax=168147.1
> The cassandra version of the cluster doesn't seem to have any impact.
> //cc [~tjake] [~benedict]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
