[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14582033#comment-14582033
 ] 

Branimir Lambov commented on CASSANDRA-7032:
--------------------------------------------

[Uploaded|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...blambov:7032-vnode-assignment]
 a new version that interprets the token ranges correctly. Also incorporates 
your changes and fixes a conversion error in the token size calculations that 
was reducing the precision to float and rarely resulting in slightly wrong 
results.

The results achieved are pretty close to what I was getting with the older 
interpretation.

> Improve vnode allocation
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7032
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7032
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Branimir Lambov
>              Labels: performance, vnodes
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>         Attachments: TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, 
> TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, TestVNodeAllocation.java, 
> TestVNodeAllocation.java
>
>
> It's been known for a little while that random vnode allocation causes 
> hotspots of ownership. It should be possible to improve dramatically on this 
> with deterministic allocation. I have quickly thrown together a simple greedy 
> algorithm that allocates vnodes efficiently, and will repair hotspots in a 
> randomly allocated cluster gradually as more nodes are added, and also 
> ensures that token ranges are fairly evenly spread between nodes (somewhat 
> tunably so). The allocation still permits slight discrepancies in ownership, 
> but it is bound by the inverse of the size of the cluster (as opposed to 
> random allocation, which strangely gets worse as the cluster size increases). 
> I'm sure there is a decent dynamic programming solution to this that would be 
> even better.
> If on joining the ring a new node were to CAS a shared table where a 
> canonical allocation of token ranges lives after running this (or a similar) 
> algorithm, we could then get guaranteed bounds on the ownership distribution 
> in a cluster. This will also help for CASSANDRA-6696.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to